Thursday, September 2, 2021

Job Shock - Moving beyond COVID 19 Employment Meltdown to a New Skilled Talent Decade - Dr. Ed Gordon

 

Job Shock
Moving Beyond the COVID-19 Employment Meltdown to a New Skilled Talent Decade
by
Edward E. Gordon
&
Elaine H. Gordon

 

Skip Oakes Graphic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2021 by Imperial Consulting Corporation

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Edward E. Gordon is the author of Skill Wars (2000), The 2010 Meltdown (2004), Winning the Global Talent Showdown (2009), and Future Work (2013 & 2018). He is a historical economist who apples interdisciplinary solutions to address the skills-jobs disconnect and related economic development issues. Gordon is the President of Imperial Consulting Corporation which he founded in 1968, He has taught at several Chicago-area universities including DePaul, Loyola, and Northwestern.

Elaine H. Gordon is Vice President of Research at Imperial. Since 1992 she has researched and edited all of its published research and co-authored two books with Edward Gordon. She was an Instruction Librarian at DePaul University from 1978 to 1992.

 

 

To contact the authors or obtain more information, visit www.imperialcorp.com.

 

 

 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

“Job Shock: Moving Beyond the COVID-19 Employment Meltdown to a New Skilled Talent Decade” is an employment “red alert” for all Americans especially parents, students and employers of all sizes who face an escalating employment crisis over the next decade. “Job Shock” focuses on the impact of COVID-19 and the consequences of a skills-jobs mismatch from 2020 to 2030.

Today’s and tomorrow’s jobs require advanced technical skill levels. Workplaces may need fewer people, but they must be better educated and able to work with advanced computer systems. This has become the new normal for employment whether it is in an office, production facility, hospital, law firm or service business.

The demand for talent and the supply of workers with the desired skills are out of balance all over the world.  The populations of Japan, South Korea, and many European nations are in decline.  India and China are moving into more sophisticated high-tech manufacturing or IT services.  They both are now encountering severe shortages of engineers, scientists, and technicians with the requisite educational preparation due to their deficient public-education systems and the inadequate standards of their institutions of higher learning.

In the United States a significant generational transition is underway. The massive baby-boomer generation has been retiring at an accelerated pace during the COVID-19 pandemic and will largely exit the workforce by 2030. The National Bureau of Economic Research warns that the technical preparation of this generation was superior to that of the generations that follow.

In 2021 about 100 million Americans of working age were not part of the U.S. labor market.  The labor participation rate has ranged from 61.4 to 61.7 percent since June 2020 dropping from 63.3 percent in February 2020 when the pandemic’s impact began.  We estimate that 12 million jobs were vacant across the United States, and surveys of employers consistently report difficulty in finding qualified people to fill open positions. Many of these vacant jobs are in in science, technology, engineering and math-related (STEM) occupations. These numbers could grow to up to 30 million vacant jobs across the United States and 95 million globally.

The outlook for the future is ominous. The United States has high numbers of high school dropouts, mediocre international test-score results, and poor completion rates for post-secondary programs. Moreover, COVID-19 shutdowns impeded the educational progress of students at all levels with low-income student suffering the greatest learning losses. While the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that by 2029 STEM occupations will grow by 8 percent compared to 3.7 percent for other occupations, the American education system is failing to provide adequate numbers of students with the science, math, and critical thinking abilities needed for STEM employment. Furthermore, American business investment in training has been lagging, even as advanced technologies are transforming the skills required in the workplace.

“Job Shock” focuses on local and regional cross-sector partnerships for finding solutions to the jobs and skills disconnect. The authors have coined the term Regional Talent Innovation Networks (RETAINs) for these public-private partnership hubs. They act as intermediaries rebuilding the pipeline that connects people to the job market. RETAINs are reinventing a 21st-century education-to-employment system thereby finding solutions to the job-skills disconnect. They have many names – High School Inc. in Santa Ana, California; Manufacturing Renaissance in Chicago, Illinois; the Vermilion Advantage in Danville, Illinois; the New North in northeastern Wisconsin; Prosper in Birmingham, Alabama; and ConxusNEO in Akron, Ohio – and more than 1,000 other non-profit RETAINs across the United States and nations throughout the world. They are providing the visionary leadership to help coordinate regional civic action behind a strategy for talent growth that jointly benefits individuals, businesses and U.S. competitive economic advantage today and into the future.


 

Job Shock: Moving Beyond the COVID-19 Employment Meltdown
to a New Skilled Talent Decade

 

Part I: Introduction: Why Read This?


Welcome to the Fourth Industrial Revolution in a COVID-19 challenged world economy. Their combined impact on the U.S. job market will stretch to 2030 and beyond. Say hello to “Job Shock!”

“Job Shock” presents our most up-to-date research on the future of the U.S. labor market over the coming decade. We review both long-term and short-term problems and solutions to them that are now under way across the United States. “Job Shock’s” premise is that America’s students and workers are as much in need of knowledge injections as they are of vaccine injections against COVID-19.

Defining the Realities of Job Shock
Technologies that have transformed American workplaces now require higher skills. The United States is not creating more high-pay, low-skilled jobs; it is creating more high-pay, higher-skilled jobs.  Unless we confront the reality of this talent mismatch, we face a decade in which there will be too many unskilled people without jobs who run a high risk for lives in poverty and too many skilled jobs without people. This potentially threatens to undermine the broader economy and increase the social disruption that has already begun.

In today’s job market at least 50 percent of today’s good jobs” (those with higher pay and benefits) do not require four-year college degrees. These jobs need students who graduate from high school with a good general educational foundation, i.e., strong reading/math comprehension, good written and verbal communication abilities, problem-solving and teamwork skills. Students then need to obtain a career certificate, apprenticeship, or a two-year degree from a technical or community college. We are not preparing enough students for the talent realities of the current U.S. job market.

The United States has millions of well-educated, talented workers.  But the unrelenting demands of Job Shock tells us that we will need to double their numbers over this decade to run our high-tech economy.

Job Shock from COVID-19
The on-going COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated this skills gap and sped up employment meltdowns. It caused the sharpest increase in the official U.S. unemployment rate ever recorded, rising from 3.5 percent in February 2020 to a peak of 14.7 percent in April. In July 2021, 17 million of the 22 million jobs lost at the start of the pandemic had been regained. The U.S. Bureaus of Labor Statistics reported a July unemployment rate of 5,4 percent and a labor participation rate of 61.7 percent, 1.6 points lower than February 2020.

But the effect of COVID upon different industries and jobs has been very uneven. The leisure and hospitality sector has been particularly hard hit with its low-wage workers experiencing the greatest job loss. Payrolls for couriers and messengers have increased by over 20 percent.

While many businesses lay off workers, others are struggling to fill job vacancies. Overall U.S. businesses continue to cut job training programs, further widening the skills gap. Businesses are increasing investments in automation and technologies that facilitate remote work. The continuing Fourth Industrial Revolution will further raise demands for workers with the skills needed to invent, use, maintain, or repair advanced technologies.

The COVID-19 pandemic is illustrating that skill shortages can have lethal results.   COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have hundreds of vacant jobs in such areas as engineering and quality control. There are acute shortages of critical-care doctors and nurses as well as lab technicians to process COVID tests.  How many of the over 630,000 dead (greater than the death toll of the U.S. armed forces in World War II) could have been saved if we had fewer shortages of medical personnel in COVID hot spots?

Also, the skilled people we take for granted to meet our daily needs are in short supply. As computer systems have become more and more central to our daily lives, breakdowns and threats to the security of our private information proliferate. Finding a qualified plumber, carpenter, electrician or medical technologist has become more difficult in many communities. If more effective talent development efforts are not initiated, there is a real danger that the world will not end in a big bang, but that it will come to a slow grinding halt due to a lack of workers with the skills needed to maintain advanced technologies. Welcome to Job Shock!

Job Shock Objectives
The goal of “Job Shock” is to raise awareness of the broad scope of the changes needed to equip students with the education and skills needed for 21st-century jobs and careers. Worker training also needs to be vastly expanded starting with incumbent worker training and extending to reskilling and upskilling employees to enable them to keep pace with constant technological advances. There are solutions already under way in communities across the United States that can help your local area. But these solutions are not easily available to all.

We see the most promising responses to job shock coming from regional cross-sector partnerships composed of business owners and managers, educators, parents, government officials, union leaders, non-profit associations, and others. These partnerships have begun regionalized initiatives to rebuild their outdated education-to-employment systems.

“Job Shock” is a call to action. We need to work together in initiating the systemic changes needed to prepare more people for better paying jobs and thus create a more equitable and prosperous economy over this decade.

Part II: What Has Changed?

Would You Use a Videotape in a Blu-ray Disc Player?
The days of semi-skilled blue-collar factory jobs are fast disappearing. These jobs once provided a 19-year-old high school graduate or drop-out with the wages and benefits needed to support a family with a middle-class standard of living. Thinking that working in low-skill manufacturing or service occupations will propel you into the middle class today is as sensible as buying a videotape for a Blu-ray disc player.

The decline of many types of U.S. manufacturing jobs was a hot political issue in both the 2016 and 2020 Presidential elections. The economic consequences of the closing of large manufacturing plants, particularly those making automobiles and large household appliances, has been especially severe. Many of these factories were located in smaller cities in which they were the central economic engines of their communities since the 1950s. They provided large numbers of assembly-line workers with well-paying, lower-skill blue-collar jobs. The growing prominence of electric vehicles has made such auto plants obsolete. The new technologies used in these vehicles mean that robotics are a central feature of their assembly lines. Such assembly lines depend on higher-skill workers who control, maintain, and repair the automated equipment. Manufacturing in general is undergoing a similar transition with jobs that support automated equipment growing dramatically.

The December 2020 survey of the National Association of Manufacturers illustrates the rapid escalation of skills demanded in manufacturing. Even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, respondents reported the “inability to attract and retain talent” as their top business challenge. The Manufacturing Institute has projected that 2.4 million manufacturing jobs will likely be unfilled over the next decade due to skill deficits.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is wiping out many types of middle-skill jobs. The COVID-19 pandemic has more severely affected middle-skill and low-skill workers.  More individuals see both their financial well-being and social status threatened. This has helped to fuel the growth of populist movements that are latching on to conspiracy theories or finding other scapegoats to blame for their current jobless or low-paying job situations. They are placing the blame on the wrong targets. They should be directing their anger at inadequate or outmoded training and education systems that do not provide the skills needed for the jobs that are currently in demand.

Demographic Time Bomb
The United States and the world are facing a structural labor-market race between advancing technology, on the one hand, and demographics and education on the other. In the United States alone 79 million baby-boomers are retiring between 2010 and 2030. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that one in five Americans will be 65 or older in 2030 and by 2025 the number of retirees will be enough to populate 27 Floridas. While the US population is projected to grow to over 355 million in 2030, an increase of about 6 percent, the working age population 18 to 64 is only projected to increase by 2 percent.

Similar demographic shifts are also occurring in other nations in Europe and Asia. Birth rates are falling significantly in Italy, Germany, China, Japan, and South Korea to name a few. In these nations as in the United States, the working age population is supporting an ever-growing number of retirees. This demographic shift increases the importance of raising worker productivity. In most nations the current pace of education reform and worker retraining will be too little, too late. For example, in China about 70 percent of the labor force remains unskilled as its huge rural population is relegated to inferior schools where most students receive no more than a junior high education.

The central premise of this “Job Shock” White Paper is that radical improvements in educational and training programs are needed to obtain a global labor force that meets the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s technological demands. American businesses have become over-reliant on importing foreign talent. However, as the world-wide war for talent heats up, it will be virtually impossible for the United States to use this strategy to compensate for our chronic domestic talent shortages. This situation is likely to become more acute between 2020 and 2030.

Lessons from the Past
This is not the first time the United States has struggled with job shock. Beginning in the1890s the spread of electric power led to mass production methods in factories and population shifting from farms to cities. Factory technologies required workers with basic reading and math skills. To meet these expanded educational needs, compulsory tax-supported education gradually spread across the nation.

The launch of Sputnik in 1957 triggered the Space Race between the United States and the Soviet Union. This spurred the growth of the American aeronautic and defense industries with a consequent rise of jobs and careers in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) areas. Encouraged by federal funding, many initiatives sought to improve and expand STEM education and interest more students in pursuing careers in these areas. The 1970s saw the introduction of personal computers (PCs) in homes and businesses across the United States further expanding technical employment growth.

The good news is that there is not a fixed number of jobs in the U.S. economy. These past disruptive job transitions provide evidence that personal attitudes toward jobs do change and that the American labor market is very elastic. The new job requirements of the 1970s sparked a nationwide impetus for improving reading, math, and science instruction in elementary and secondary schools. There also was tremendous growth in educational options at the college level, and U.S. businesses developed in-house training and education programs for new and incumbent workers.

Today’s Job Demands
The Space Race and computer technology revolution produced islands of educational excellence but did not lead to the general development and expansion of education programs across the United States. The current education-to-employment system lags far behind the rate of change in the skill demands of the U.S. labor economy. Two-thirds of occupations now require post-secondary education, while a high school education or less suffices for only about one-third of jobs.

The challenge we now face is that only about one-third of our high school graduates leave school with reading and math comprehension at the twelfth-grade level. These skill levels are needed for the successful completion of post-secondary certificates, apprenticeships, community college two-year degrees, or four-year degrees.

The depth of this problem was revealed by a 2020 Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy Literacy/Gallup Inc analysis. It stated that 54 percent of U.S. adults aged 16 to 74 – 130 million people – lack reading proficiency, i.e., are reading below the sixth- or eighth-grade level. This report estimated that the annual cost of this literacy deficit to the U.S. economy is $2.4 trillion.

Today’s technologies are increasing the importance of the ability to work in teams that often include workers in a variety of skill and job classifications. This in turn is heightening the importance of so-called “soft skills,” such as effective communication, problem-solving, self-motivation, time management, leadership, and ethical workplace standards.

 The COVID-19 crisis has abruptly changed workplaces and skill demands worldwide. It is increasing the adoption of automation, robotics, and technologies that facilitate remote-work options. In this changed environment, adaptability has become a vital skill. A key to adaptability is the cognitive ability of learning how to learn as it enables workers to quickly gain new knowledge and analyze how to implement it to meet new workforce challenges.

The United States is now facing a need to provide updated education and training to two expanding sectors of the adult population – those who are not currently employed and those who need to transition to other occupations due to the impact of the COVID pandemic. In addition, the talent development needs of the currently employed workforce must be addressed.

Part III: The Kids and Workers Are Not “All Right”

Many students and workers cannot accept the new reality that they are undereducated for many jobs in this decade’s labor market, let alone future ones!

KNAPP has created a robot for warehouses with the dexterity to recognize and sort random items with 99 percent accuracy. Once such robots are put into operation, humans would continue to work alongside them, but the catch is that these workers will need a whole set of additional skills.

“If this happens 50 years from now,” stated Pieter Abbeel, an artificial intelligence professor at University of California, Berkeley, “there is plenty of time for the educational system to catch up to the job market.” The trouble with his prediction is that the COVID-19 pandemic has sped up companies’ plans to further automate workplaces today!

Throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, small business owners have consistently reported that the quality of labor was an important business problem. In a July 2021 National Federation of Independent Business survey 61 percent of the respondents were trying to hire and 93 percent of these employers reported few or no qualified applicants for their job openings.

This situation is the result of outdated regional education-to-employment systems across the United States. They have largely become broken pipelines with an inadequate flow of people qualified to fill local jobs. Unfortunately, this skills-jobs gap has persisted throughout the last two decades.  As labor economist, Kevin Hollenbeck wrote in 2013, “I am reminded of the adage about the frog in the pot. If you put a frog into a pot of boiling water, it will jump out. But if you put a frog in a pot of water and then slowly boil it, the consequences will be dire for the frog. . . . We (workers, employers, policymakers, and politicians) like that frog, have not been alarmed enough by the signals of a widening skills-jobs gap . . . to jump to action, and now we face the dire consequences in the form of a “talent cliff.”

The COVID-19 pandemic has made this talent cliff steeper.  The switch to remote schooling has meant that many students may be behind as much as a full grade level. Jobs go unfilled due to the lack of qualified applicants while more workers remain unemployed for six months or more and the labor-force participation rate decreases. Clearly the kids and workers are not “all right.” Denial or wishful thinking will not change this job shock reality.

Knowledge Shock
The 2017 film “Hidden Figures” focuses on the lives of three African-American women who NASA hired because of their advanced math attainments. Through making important contributions to NASA’s space mission, these women overcame race and gender discrimination, earned the respect of their co-workers, and secured career advancement. These three women are unsung heroes of the U.S. space race against the Soviet Union.

What was a major reason for their success?  With the long-term help of their parents, each of the women overcame formidable barriers to obtaining the educational preparation that developed their mathematical talents. Education is a shared responsibility between parents and schools. Education should begin at home. Habits of learning should be instilled there. Parents can help a child ‘learn-how-to-learn by fostering each child’s personal talents and interests.

Unfortunately, America’s popular culture does not esteem educators or link educational attainment to success in life. Parents are the primary motivators of their children.  If parents do not believe that doing well in school is very important, neither will their children.

Many parents also believe that their local school is providing a good education to their children. Regretfully this is often not the case. Education levels have not kept pace with skill demands in workplaces.

There is ample evidence that K-12 education in the United States is not providing many students with the educational foundations needed for their future development. Every two years nationwide achievement tests are given to students in grades 4, 8, and 12. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) commonly called the “Nation’s Report Card” is conducted by the U.S. Department of Education. Recent results have been nothing short of alarming.

Students are ranked at four levels: below basic, basic, proficient (at grade level), and advanced (above grade level). The Grade 4 test results in 2019 were: 65 percent read below grade level, 26 percent were at grade level, and 9 percent were above grade level. Fourth grade is a crucial point for reading attainment because in the first three grades students are taught how to read, but by the fourth grade they should have attained a level of reading proficiency that enables them to learn how to learn.

At grade 12 in 2019, 37 percent received NAEP reading scores of proficient or above. However, 30 percent were at the below basic level which was larger than in any previous assessment year. In math only 24 percent of high school seniors were at the proficient or above levels.

Yet paradoxically the U.S. high school graduation rate had been rising. How can this be explained? Grade-level standards are being downgraded or bypassed. For instance, failing students are enrolled in special “credit recovery programs” that allow them to move on to the next grade or graduate with no or minimal academic standards for a passing grade. Moreover COVID-19 has largely obliterated high school graduation requirements. During 2020 most state boards of education allowed school districts to eliminate exit examinations or lower the number of credits needed for graduation. In Oregon exit proficiency exam requirements in reading, writing and math have been dropped until 2024 when new state standards are scheduled for adoption.

The NAEP scores indicate that a large proportion of U.S. students are not equipped with the basic educational foundation needed for success in post-secondary programs. About 67 percent of high school graduates attend higher educational institutions. After six years only about one-third complete a degree, certificate or apprenticeship.

Many of these students take either the SAT or ACT exams that are designed to access their readiness for higher learning. Between 1967 and 2017 overall test scores on these exams have declined. In 2019 only 37 percent of ACT takers and 45 percent of SAT takers tested fully ready for post-secondary programs.

Most higher-educational institutions are compelled to offer remedial education for entering students. About 40 percent of entering freshmen are now enrolled in non-college credit reading, math, or written communication classes. At some institutions over 90 percent of entering students need remedial education. Poor student preparation is also leading to declining quality in higher education.

America does have excellent schools and universities. On the 2020 Social Progress Index the United States ranked first in the world in the quality of its universities. But on this same index, the United States ranked 91st in student access to a quality elementary/secondary education. Over the past decade the decline of the U.S. rank on this indicator has been greater than that any other nation. Unless widespread systemic reform of U.S. K-12 education becomes a national priority, a significant proportion of the next generation of American workers will be under-skilled for employment in the workplaces of the future.

COVID-19 Learning Consequences
Since March 2020 almost all K-12 students have been receiving at least some instruction remotely rather than in the classroom. When the pandemic subsides, what kind of learning losses can we expect?

·         Millions of low-income and rural students lacked reliable internet access and about 3 million mainly low-income students were not enrolled in school.  Many will likely fall behind a full grade level or more.

·         The longer the pandemic persists, the greater the harm to students being taught fully or partly online.

·         Online learning is less effective for younger students as their attention spans are limited, and it also negatively impacts their social skill development.

·         Testing conducted by Curriculum Associates in the spring of 2021 indicated that elementary school students on average were 5 months behind in mathematics and 4 months behind in reading. These results, however, only included students who could be tested in schools, not dropouts or those in remote learning.

·         The sharp rise of chronic absenteeism indicates that high school dropout rates will increase significantly.

COVID-19 has also led to a severe decline in enrollments at America’s community colleges. Student enrollment was down 10 percent in the fall of 2020 compared to that of 2019. Because community colleges are an important component of apprenticeship, certificate, and other job preparation programs, this is a significant blow to the development of a more skilled workforce. Moreover, community colleges are the most accessible post-secondary option for low-income Americans whose K-12 education has suffered most due to a lack of internet access.

The Best Time for Education Reform Is Now!
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, as the Brookings Report “Beyond Reopening Schools” cogently states “it is hard to image there will be another moment in history when the central role of education in the economic, social, and political prosperity and stability of nations is so obvious and well understood by the general population.”  Now clearly is the time for local, state, and federal action to revitalize K-12 education in the United States.

It is time to go beyond piecemeal reforms and playing “blame games” if we are to close the widening gap in the quality of U.S. education. There are some fundamental components of quality education that can be learned from the study of the world’s most successful educational systems.

1.      Great teachers: The key to boosting student results is improving instruction. Teachers need to thoroughly know their subjects and then receive extensive training and coaching in instructional methodology before and after they begin teaching. More top college students need to become teachers. To attract and retain these recruits, we need to front-load their compensation so that entry-level salaries are competitive with those of alternate professions. To keep their skills up-to-date, teachers need quality professional development programs throughout their careers.

2.      Effective Principals: School principals need to be educated and trained as both efficient administrators and drivers of instructional improvement. They have a key leadership role in fostering a culture of high expectations in educational attainment for teachers, students, and parents.

3.      Updated curriculums: All states need to mandate strengthened 21st-century curriculums to give more students the educational foundations necessary for high-skill/high-paying employment. As Figure 1 illustrates with a humorous touch, learning is a complex process in which individual characteristics play an important role in how each person acquires knowledge. More ways of accommodating learning styles are needed at all levels of education. For example, to counter student dissatisfaction and lack of motivation that is common at the high school level, career education programs and advanced placement courses should be more widely available.

4.      The Key Role of Parents:  The switch to remote schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have greatly increased parent awareness of the difficulties teachers face in keeping students engaged and in helping them make progress in their day-to-day learning. This should motivate parents to take a greater interest in the quality of the schooling their children are receiving and cooperate more fully in the fostering their children’s daily academic progress.

 

 

Figure 1

 

 


Skip Oakes Graphic

 

 


The Looming Disaster of Job Shock
As low-skill jobs shrink due to automation, underprivileged elementary, high school and community college students will bear the brunt of technological advances. They are under threat of becoming the “technopeasants” of the 21st century.

We are referring to millions of our future workers who deserve an education systemically updated to meet the knowledge and skill demands of modern workplaces. America needs them to become part of a new talent pool for the 21st-century, not the victims of job shock.

 

Part IV: A New Time Bomb: An Explosion of Skilled Worker Shortages

It is already apparent that as COVID-19 restrictions ease, a pent-up demand for many types of goods and services will be unleashed. As businesses reopen or expand to meet this boom, the demand for skilled workers will soar. It is not likely to fall for the rest of this decade. A major demographic shift, serious education deficits, and rising job-skill demands have combined with COVID-19 to undermine the quality and composition of the U.S. labor force.  Recent National Federation of Independent Business monthly surveys report that small business owners’ plans to create new jobs were a record highs, but that unfilled job openings were far above historical averages. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that there were a record 10.1 million job openings at the end of July 2021, and the ratio of vacant jobs to hires was 140 percent. We estimate the true number to vacant jobs to be over 12 million.

Employers Face Mounting Skills Challenges
COVID-19 has greatly increased the need for skills training. The shift to remote work has placed new skill demands on many employees. Because of the pandemic’s devastating effect on certain industries, about 20 percent of U.S. workers have left their former jobs for new types of work. A March 2021 Prudential Pulse of American Worker Survey found that about one-quarter of the workers surveyed plan to look for a different job with another employer once the current crisis eases. All these factors indicate that employee training must be greatly increased.

A significant shift in the priorities of American businesses is urgently needed. In recent years business expenditures on training and education have declined. For each dollar America’s chief foreign competitors invest in employee talent development, U.S. business invests only 20 cents. Training is mostly concentrated on managers and professionals. Only about 20 to 30 percent of U.S. employers have offered entry-level job training or provided employees with training updates. Much of what is now done is mandated by safety regulations. It is not about building new skills.

A recent McKinsey Global Survey found that 69 percent of businesses were doing more skill building than they did prior to the pandemic. However, only 28 percent of these organizations had a training department or similar facility focused on learning. The organizations that employed a variety of education/training methods reported a higher rate of success in reskilling and upskilling their employees.

Even though COVID-19 has greatly increased the need for entry-level training and reskilling, many businesses are again expanding stock buy-backs and increasing dividends rather than investing in worker skills. American companies and organizations instead need to launch new HR initiatives to fill skilled job vacancies and upskill their existing employees through a variety of means including corporate universities and training partnerships.

Human and Financial Costs
Job Shock will have a major economic impact in the United States and globally. In 2030 estimated U.S unfilled jobs range from 25 to 30 million. Globally over 95 million jobs could be vacant. The financial costs for individuals, businesses, and nations will be staggering. By 2030 U.S. GDP loss could be over $2.5 trillion. Global losses might reach $18 trillion.

Job Shock: The End of Profit?
The picture that emerges from before, during, and after the COVID-19 crisis is an American workforce with an abundance of people, but a shortfall of talent for the jobs of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. An analysis of the composition of the U.S. labor market at the beginning 2020 and projecting what it might be like in 2030 if the education-to-employment system remains unchanged shows:

Chart 1

 


2020 (See Chart 1.)
Seventy percent of jobs (114 million) were high to mid-skill. Only 55 million workers were qualified. The result was a 60 million job deficit. American employers tried to fill these vacancies with retired baby-boomers, workers brought from other countries, foreign students attending U.S. universities, and/or the increased use of automation. Companies unable to find skilled talent moved their jobs abroad.

Thirty percent of all jobs (50 million) were lower skilled. There were 110 million workers at that level, i.e., with limited math and reading competencies. The result was a 60 million worker surplus. Many gave up looking for a job (and thus were not counted as unemployed) because they were not offered entry-level job training.

The 10.5 million estimated vacant jobs cost the United States $253 billion in lost productivity and profit.

Chart 2

 

 


 

2030 (See Chart 2.)
At least 75 percent of jobs (128 million) will be high to mid-skill. Only 33 percent of American workers (about 56 million) will be qualified for these jobs, resulting in a 72 million job deficit. The U.S. skilled labor shortage will deepen because 70 million baby-boomers will have aged out of the workforce, a global 50 to 95 million skilled worker shortages will limit immigration to the United States, and increased automation will demand ever higher skill levels from workers.  STEM jobs will among the fastest growing over this decade. The pace of companies leaving the United States due to skilled-talent shortages will rise.

In contrast, 25 percent of U.S. jobs (42 million) will remain low skill. If education and skill upgrades are not adopted over this decade, possibly 114 million low skill people will be in the U.S. labor force. A huge “techno-peasant” underclass will compete for a diminishing number of low skill jobs. High unemployment coupled with mounting skill shortfalls could pose a real threat to American social stability.

An estimated 30 million vacant jobs are possible. The annual economic loss to the U.S. economy will be between $1 trillion to over $2.5 trillion.

The Job Shock Crossroad
We do have the power over this decade to increase the education and skills of American workers. We can produce a workforce that meets the talent requirements of 2030. It does require coordinated actions from key sections of our society. Picture the American talent creation system as a boat with two figures pulling the oars and a third at the rudder. Parents are the rudder steering a better course for their child’s future. One oar is pulled by educators (K-12, post-secondary). The other oar is in the hands of employers providing job training and skill updates to their workers. If one or more of these parties fails at their roles, the boat goes off-course, stops, or sinks from ever larger job shock waves.

This coordinated effort needs to start at the regional level. Enlightened community leaders need to pull together to keep the boat on course. The COVID-19 pandemic has produced a storm of hurricane proportions making the need for immediate action more vital than ever.

Yet many people across America remain opposed to systemic social changes. They are deeply divided into multiple warring “tribes.” They remain at war with each other rather than working to reach agreement on vital common goals. Their acceptance of the cold, hard facts of “Job Shock” remains a hard sell.

The longer the United States delays making systemic changes to the education-to-employment system, the deeper the economic and social turmoil between now and 2030. As Lawrence Summers, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary said about employment, “Walk outside: labor shortage is the pervasive phenomenon.”

 

Part V: Talent RX: RETAIN Partnerships

The COVID-10 pandemic has triggered widespread doubts about the future. The U.S. job market is in chaos. At the end of July 2021, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported an unprecedented 10.1 million job openings across many business sectors. Might this finally be the right time to start anew and find fresh solutions to the skills-jobs shock now underway?

Today’s unprecedented economic upheaval presents an unprecedented opportunity. There are millions of unemployed on the one hand, and rapidly evolving job-skill needs on the other – providing a way for the former to solve the latter’s problem. Communities across the United States have a diversity of underdeveloped talent. They badly need local pathways that promote equity through offering high quality educational opportunities that are accessible to everyone. This means providing more students and workers with enhanced talent development programs aligned with personal aptitudes and interests and the needs of local business and organizations.

The current U.S. labor market is in desperate need of more people who have developed their cognitive, interpersonal, and leadership skills. People who can problem-solve. These people aren’t going to drop from the skies. You can’t click for brains. How can we successfully prepare more people for the skilled jobs of today and tomorrow?

RETAINs
Across the United States at least 1,000 non-profit groups have organized to reinvent local talent-delivery systems. These public-private partnerships bring together a broad cross-section of community groups, such as parent organizations; chambers-of-commerce; K-12 and higher educational institutions; workforce boards, regional economic development commissions; local governments; unions; service clubs; foundations and other non-profit social welfare agencies. (See Figure 2.)

Figure 2
RETAINs’ Shared Vision

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To provide a descriptive term for such organizations, we coined the term Regional Talent Innovation Network (RETAIN). They have many local brand names, such as The New North (Northeast Wisconsin), High School Inc (Santa Ana, California), the Vermillion Advantage (Danville, Illinois), ConxusNEO (Akron, Ohio), the Community Education Coalition (Columbus, Indiana), Manufacturing Renaissance (Chicago, Illinois) and Prosper (Birmingham, Alabama).

RETAINs began in the 1990s to respond to the economic erosion of their communities. Instead of seeing their young people move elsewhere for employment, they sought to retain them in their communities. Keeping the population stable also enabled communities to retain local businesses and thus stop the erosion of the tax base. Once these communities built a skilled workforce, they could attract new businesses to locate there.

In the short term, RETAINs build a network in which local businesses collaborate with training organizations, educational institutions, and in-house training departments to provide training for vacant jobs and to upskill current employees. This both enables employees to move into higher-skill/higher-paying jobs and enhances the profitability of local businesses through the more efficient use of new technologies. Access to pooled resources make these training collaboratives particularly beneficial to smaller businesses that cannot afford to provide their own in-house training.

In the long-term RETAINs update educational programs at all levels starting in elementary schools and extending to a wide variety of post-secondary options including certificate and apprenticeships programs. They work to harmonize existing educational programs and devise new ways to fill in skill gaps. RETAINs help reconcile funding streams and secure new revenue to integrate K-12, career education, higher education, and adult training. (See Figure 3.)

Figure 3
What RETAINs Do DD0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

We agree with a Wall Street Journal editorial (June 9, 2021) that failing K-12 public schools are the “root cause of America’s skilled-worker shortage.” K-12 schools are locally controlled. RETAINs foster communication and cooperation among diverse community sectors. Many students today lack motivation as they find schooling too abstract and unrelated to the “real world.”  These students and teachers need active connections with local employers to learn about the education and skills required for careers in today’s workplaces. Local businesses need to interact with both public and private high school students through sponsoring career education programs, internships, and other activities that allow students to explore career areas that align with their aptitudes and interests.

RETAINs see themselves as joint partners in community building and in the renewal of the U.S. free enterprise system. They are rebuilding the pipeline that connect their community members to the job market. The key words here are “bottom-up collaboration” – defined as joint authority, joint responsibility, and joint accountability among all the partners.

RETAINs Can Make a Difference
The good news is what we can expect if RETAINs are instituted across America to rebuild the U.S. workforce. (See Chart 3.) In 2030 the U.S. economy will support about 170 million jobs; 128 million of them will be high-skill or mid-skill jobs. RETAINs can increase the expected 56 million high/mid-skill workers by retraining 30 million additional workers and preparing 10 million more students for skilled employment. Thus 96 million high/mid-skill workers will be available.

Chart 3

Combining these job-ready workers with additional automation will reduce the number of vacant jobs across the economy. There still will be a substantial, but not overwhelming number of surplus workers. However as more communities use the RETAIN model to sustain job-ready workforces, the number will fall. The American middle class will grow again as high wage employment rises.

Moving Forward
The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened job shock in the United States and around the globe. It has disrupted schooling leaving the economically disadvantaged even further behind. Millions of workers have either changed jobs or faced unemployment. Education and training solutions are more vital than ever before. RETAINs can be an important force in preparing students and workers for positions in America’s fast paced, technologically driven, knowledge economy. Regional development can better support broad economic expansion and ensure that the United States remains a highly competitive global economy.

 

Part VI: RETAIN Case Studies: Partnerships Rebuilding Local Employment Pipelines

Across the United States RETAINs have many local brand names.  RETAINs bring together enlightened community leaders from many industry sectors. They cooperate in developing initiatives that provide career education and information to students and retrain incumbent workers to meet the skill demands of workplace technology changes. The goals of RETAINs are to strengthen local institutions and competitive companies while providing local residents with better job opportunities.

There are many paths to pursuing these objectives. Here are examples of RETAINs that are continuing to develop programs that address the talent challenges in their communities.

Manufacturing Renaissance, Chicago, Illinois
For the past 38 years Manufacturing Renaissance (MR) has been recognized as a leading expert, advocate and practitioner of policies and programs that support the manufacturing sector as a primary strategy for reducing poverty, expanding inclusion, and sustaining middle-class communities.

MR has currently developed programs in three areas: Career Pathway Services, Policy and Advocacy, and Economic Development. Here is a snapshot of MR’s Career Pathway Services:

Manufacturing Connect.  MC is a program designed to expose, inspire, prepare, and support youth and young adults to pursue career pathways in manufacturing.  MC is a community-based program serving in-school youth, ages 14-18, to provide high quality, career pathway programming including career exposure, technical training and work experiences to help young people start and keep good paying jobs in manufacturing.

Young Manufacturers Association. The YMA serves as both a network and a program for young adults, aged 18-29, who are pursuing careers in manufacturing, in-between jobs, in training or interested in starting a career in manufacturing. Through regular meetings and social events, they support one another as peers through training, transition into permanent employment, professional and life skills development, and balancing personal and work life dynamics. The YMA as a program provides services on an as-needed basis, including career coaching, wrap-around supports, employer liaison to help troubleshoot issues that come up at work, and technical training. Together, the YMA network and program are serving the untapped talent and potential that young adults specifically represent to their communities and their current or future employers. 

Instructors Apprenticeship for Advanced Manufacturing. IAAM was developed in partnership with the Chicago Teachers Union Foundation and the National Institute for Metalworking Skills to train the next generation of great machining instructors to be technologically, culturally, and pedagogically competent in the machine shop classroom.  

Career Pathway Services is not a traditional workforce development program. MR draws heavily from a youth development and social services orientation to engage youth and young adults who typically may not identify or seek out manufacturing as a pathway that can assist them in achieving their life goals. MR introduces young people to the sector, finds a variety of ways for them to relate to peers already in the sector to help illuminate what could be possible for their future. No matter what they ultimately choose, young people benefit from having a network of professional and social support, work experiences, technical and professionalism skills. For those who enroll in our training program and choose to pursue a career-track job in manufacturing we support them as much as possible through training, job placement and beyond to help ensure their success.

MR is expanding its reach in Cook County and showing the way for other RETAINs to begin similar efforts. It illustrates that for a RETAIN to be successful there must be strong cooperation among educational entities, the business community, unions. government agencies, and non-profit partners.

High School Inc., Santa Ana, California
The initial impetus for the creation of the High School Inc. Academies Foundation came from local business leaders in the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce. Starting in 2003, members of the Chamber of Commerce held discussions with school districts officials on how to raise student achievement. The result was a partnership involving the Chamber, the Foundation and the Santa Ana Unified School District. An official “Memorandum of Understanding was signed by all three partners in May of 2006. This agreement outlined the responsibilities of each partner for the development and operation of the High School Inc. program.

The first six High School Inc. Academies began in 2007 on the campus of Santa Ana Valley High School in the Santa Ana Unified School District. The district’s Career Technical Education (CTE) department conducts monthly meetings with High School Inc.’s staff to maintain the continuity and effectiveness of the academies.

At Valley High School, the High School Inc. Academies merge both academic and technical skills through Project Based Learning (PBL), competitions, mentorships, and business internships. Because of the success of the High School Inc. academies, there has been considerable growth in the school district’s creation of career pathways in business and industry sectors. These pathways start as early as sixth grade in the school district’s intermediate schools and send students into the waiting High School Inc. Academies.

The number of Valley high school students categorized as “socioeconomically disadvantaged” in 2008 was 80 percent. However, with the help of talented teachers and staff members, and the existence of High School Inc., Valley High School has raised the level of achievement for all Valley high school students.

Mary Tran, Executive Director of High School Inc. reports that the six High School Inc. Academies have grown from an enrollment of 96 students at its start in 2007 to over 1,572 students in 2019. The Academies boast a 98 percent high school graduation rate. In the past year there have been 160 professional internships for seniors. The number of students receiving "Industry Certifications" after a minimum of two years in the program was 511, with over 319 students participating in business/industry themed competitions. Students in the 2018-2019 received over 950 hours of volunteer time from business and industry representatives. The program has received numerous awards and recognitions including the prestigious "Golden Bell Award" given to High School Inc. in 2014 by the California School Board Association.

Jack E. Oakes, an officer on the Board of Directors for High School Inc., says “High School Inc.’s development has produced the realization that, before students can be College and Career Ready, they must be ‘Achievement Ready.’ Students reach this new level of preparedness by being motivated to strive at or beyond their potential. The High School Inc. model ensures that students are Achievement Ready before they graduate and pursue higher education and careers. The reforms at Valley High School embrace the mission of High School Inc. ‘to empower youth and strengthen communities through education and business partnerships.’ ”

Vermilion Advantage, Danville, Illinois
The Danville Area Economic Development Corporation has been operating in Danville for 39 years.  This organization merged with the Chamber of Commerce in 2002 to form a single entity- Vermilion Advantage.  Vermilion Advantage is the lead agency in the county for economic development, workforce support, and local business data.

Vermilion Advantage is a unique hybrid organization that employs a multi-pronged approach to economic development, workforce development, and community development.  It works closely with the county’s communities and businesses to anticipate, develop, and maintain a viable workforce and community.  Its mission is to create a community where people work, live and play.

 

Workforce development continues to be a high priority.  The Vermilion Advantage partners with the local community college and the Workforce Investment Board to introduce high school students in Vermilion County to apprenticeships, internships, and other career-related programs that are central to the continued success of the local economy.

 

The New North, Northeast Wisconsin
The New North geographic region covers the 18 northeast counties of Wisconsin.  Since it started in 2005 New North, Inc. has grown to become a RETAIN that now has the support of over 100 private investors.  It fosters collaboration among a long list of private and public sector leaders and governmental entities. Its website includes multiple resources for employers, workers, educational institutions, students, and parents. It facilitates communication among these communities providing such information as in-demand jobs and careers, the educational requirements for them, and regional resources for obtaining the needed educational preparation.

New North acts as an intermediary in workforce and career development that enables key industry sectors to build stronger employment pipelines. It acts as an umbrella organization linking industry associations including the Northeast Wisconsin (NEW) Manufacturing Alliance, Northeast Wisconsin Educational Resource Alliance (NEW ERA), NEW Digital Alliance, and the NEW Construction Alliance.

The NEW Manufacturing Alliance began in 2006 with 12 manufacturers has grown to over 300 member organizations. It provides information on careers in advanced manufacturing to local students in middle schools, high schools, and local community/technical colleges.  The alliance actively recruits students using plant tours, career speakers, and job shadowing.  Ann Franz, the Alliance’s executive director, states its central message “that manufacturing is a vibrant, well-paying career is resonating with people.”

The alliance also posts its member companies’ employment opportunities on its website (www.newmfgalliance.org), showing the training and education requirements and skills required for each job.  Many member companies offer tuition reimbursement for their employees. The Alliance’s Earn and Learn Program pairs high school seniors in youth apprenticeship programs or taking dual-credit courses in manufacturing with area manufacturers who want to offer a training opportunity to such students. The companies pay a portion of the college course tuition for these students and the students work part-time for the manufacturers.  

ConxusNEO, Akron, Ohio
ConxusNEO is focused on building the capacity and improving the performance of the talent ecosystem in Summit County, OH. Rather than running programs, ConxusNEO takes stock of organizations doing programming within five essential functions to prepare young people and adults with the skills and competencies companies tell us they need.  The five functions are: Awareness, Exploration, Development, Connection and Upskill (See Figure 4.)

Figure 4

 

ConxusNEO supports programs that deliver positive outcomes, so they have the resources they need to continue and, in some cases, to scale their work. ConxusNEO also identifies gaps in the system that need to be shored up. In some cases, new programs need to be created to continue to cultivate a comprehensive system that delivers the results wanted in the local community. ConxusNEO is also establishing key performance indicators within each of these functions to begin to track community-wide outcomes.

In order to accomplish this, it partners with companies to identify the skills they need, and it supports them to work with educators, and a range of other partners to innovate solutions that: (1) fill open positions and (2) build a talent pipeline with those skills

ConxusNEO has created industry sector partnerships within the manufacturing, tech and healthcare sectors to bring all of these partners together. Its role is to convene and facilitate the process.

The bottom line is that every organization wins when a cooperative program is done well. Companies become investors in the education system instead of simply consumers. That’s one of the reasons the College and Career Academies of Akron has been so successful in engaging the business community. Businesses helped to establish new pathways aligned with demand and provide experiential learning opportunities and curriculum development support. ConxusNEO served as the community convener for the master planning process and it continues to support implementation.

As the work of ConxusNEO is driven by the demand for specific skills, it routinely compiles, analyzes and shares data with its partners and vets this kind of information with the companies themselves.

And while jobs like retail and fast food are in greatest demand, ConxusNEO focused on good and promising jobs for Summit County residents – ones that have a career pathway and that provide a good wage with benefits and advancement opportunities.

Summing Up
Each organization profiled here has continued to evolve to meet the challenges posed by technological, economic, and workforce shifts. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted American life at many levels. It opens up new opportunities for many communities to use the RETAIN model as their first step toward a more knowledgeable workforce and the better paying jobs of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

 

Part VII: Final Word:  A Decisive Skilled  Talent Decade

The Great Job Awakening
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a pivotal time in history. It has caused disastrous disruptions to the world’s economies including that of the United States and radically shifted people’s priorities.  During the pandemic many who lost their jobs when their employers downsized or disappeared were struggling to find good paying jobs. As pandemic restrictions started to be lifted in the spring of 2021, sizeable numbers of people have not been returning to the labor market. The rate of baby-boomer retirements accelerated during the pandemic.  Some workers (especially in the leisure and hospitality sectors) seem to have decided that they do not want to return to their former jobs and instead want to seek employment in other industries

As the number of job openings have swelled to unprecedented levels, businesses cannot find workers with the skills needed for their vacant jobs. In many businesses sectors and parts of the country, employers report that finding qualified workers is their top business problem. To attract employees, many employers are raising wages, offering flexible hours, and using a variety of other strategies to find the workers they need.

The purpose of this “Job Shock” White Paper is to trigger a major mindset change about the wide gulf between education and skills needed for the in-demand jobs of today and tomorrow and the current state of the nation’s education-to-employment systems. Past history tells us that when people are emerging from a great crisis, they are more open to considering systemic change. Suddenly people realize how important education and job skills have become for them and also for their children’s future.

Enlightened Leadership
During the First Industrial Revolution, education reforms were needed to support the new math and literacy demands in the offices and factories of rapidly expanding cities. Starting at the regional and state levels, enlightened community leaders spearheaded the expansion of compulsory tax-supported primary and secondary education. By 1918 all of the then 48 states mandated this standard of public schooling backed by tough truancy laws. The United States was the first nation to do this!

This education-to-employment system is now out of date as a larger percent of jobs in the Fourth Industrial Revolution require higher levels of reading and math comprehension and some form of post-secondary education. During the U.S. Civil War, Abraham Lincoln said, “Enlightened leaders and publics can create together sane and inclusive policies that strengthen our vital institutions at home and abroad.” This is another era of great upheaval and crisis. To help our communities survive and thrive, sweeping reforms are needed. “Job Shock” has identified regional leaders who are already at work in many American communities to update community talent-development systems. They need our support to bring these efforts to scale across the United States.

Building RETAINs
“Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.”  RETAINs can form the bridge that connects people to jobs. RETAIN building requires 3 steps:

1.    Awareness – finding solutions for skills-jobs shortfalls.

2.    Alignment – facing the challenges of partnership formation by learning how to work effectively with others.

3.    Action – implementing training and education programs for adult workers as well as career education and information initiatives for K-12 students.

We can’t afford to wait for others to take concerted action in our communities. The passive attitude that somehow America will muddle through has hit the hard wall of reality.

We hope that “Job Shock” will motivate readers to ask, “What action can I take to relieve this skilled worker shortage?”  The opportunity for making this a decisive skilled labor decade may well hinge on your answer.

The time is now. The urgency is clear! The challenge can be met!

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 Reports

Abel, Amy Lui and Sherlin Nair. “Future Skilling Your Workforce,” The Conference Board, August 2015.

Arabandi, Bhavani et al. “Building Sustainable Apprenticeships,” Urban Institute, February 2021.

Bakhshi, H. et al. “The Future of Skills Employment in 2030,” Pearson & Nesta, 2017.

Barber, Michael, “How the World’s Bust Performing School Systems Come Out on Top,” McKinsey & Company, September 2007.

Broady, Kristen et. al. “Preparing U.S. Workers for the Post-COVID Economy,” Brookings Institution, December 2020.

Billing, Fabian et al. “Building Workforce Skills at Scale to Thrive During – and after – the COVID-19 Crisis,” McKinsey & Company Global Survey, April 30, 2021.

Bughin, Jacques et al. “Skill Shift: Automation and the Future of the Workforce,” McKinsey Global Institute, Many 23, 2018.

Carnevale, Anthony P. et al. “15 Million Infrastructure Jobs: An Economic Shot in the Arm to the COVID-19 Recession, Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce, 2012.

_____. “Recovery: Job Growth and Education Requirements through 2020,” Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce, 2013.

_____. “Workplace Basics: The Competencies Employers Want.” Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce, November 2020.

Centre for the New Economy & Society, “The Future of Jobs Report 2018,” World Economic Forum, 2018.

Clark, John. “College Alumni See Room for Job-Skill Improvement,” Gallup Inc., July 14, 2020.

“Closing the Skills Gap: What Workers Want,” ManpowerGroup, 2020.

“The Condition of College and Career Readiness,” ACT Inc., October 2019..

DePaoli, Jennifer L. et al. “Building a Grad Nation: Progress and Challenge in Raising High School Graduation Rates – 2017 Annual Update,” Civic Enterprises and Everyone Graduates Center, School of Education Johns Hopkins University, 2017.

“Different Skills, Different Gaps: Measuring and Closing the Skills Gap,” Burning Glass Technologies and U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, March 2018.

Dorn, Emma et al. “COVID-19 and Education: The Lingering Effects of Unfinished Learning,” McKinsey & Company, July 27, 2021.

Edmondson, Amy et al. “Putting Lifelong Learning on the CEO Agenda, McKinsey & Company, September 2017.

Escobari, Marcela et al. “Realism about Reskilling,” Brookings Institution, December 2019.

“The Future of Jobs: Employment Skills & Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” World Economic Forum, January 2016.

“Future of Work: The Global Talent Crunch,” Korn Ferry, 2018.

“The Global Skills Shortage: Bridging the Talent Gap with Education, Training and Sourcing,” Society for Human Resource Management, 2019.

Harris, Karen et. al. “Labor 2030: The Collision of Demographics, Automation, and Inequality, Bain & Company, February 7, 2018.

“Hiring in the Modern Talent Marketplace,” Center for Education and the Workforce, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, February 2020.

Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy et al. “COVID-19 Sparks an Overdue Discussion on Education Reform: An Optimistic Vision,” Brookings Institution, January 4, 2021.

Holtz-Eakin, Douglas and Tom Lee. “Projecting Future Skill Shortages through 2029,” American Action Forum, July 18, 2019.

Hoteit, Leila et al. “Government Must Fix the Skills Mismatch for a Post-Coronavirus World,” Boston Consulting Group, May 28, 2020.

Jacoby, Tamar and Roy Haskins. “Kentucky FAME: Fulfilling the Promise of Apprenticeship,” Opportunity America and the Brookings Institution, October 2020.

“Is This Working?” Pulse of the American Worker Survey: Special Report, Prudential Financial Inc., March 2021.

“Jobs of Tomorrow: Mapping Opportunity in the New Economy,” World Economic Forum, January 2020.

Kivacs-Ondrejkovic, Orsolya et al. “Decoding Global Trends in Upskilling and Reskilling,” Boston Consulting Group, November 2019.

Krentz, Matt et al. “Two Groups You Can’t Ignore (but Probably Do) in the War for Talent,” Boston Consulting Group, 2018.

“Labor Shortages Are Making a Comeback,” Research Report, The Conference Board, June 6, 2021.

Levanon, Gad. “U.S. Labor Shortages: Challenges and Solutions,” The Conference Board, 2019.

Levesque, Elizabeth M. “Understanding the Skills Gap – and What Employers Can Do about It,” Brookings Institution, December 2019.

Lorenz, Markus, “Man and Machine in Industry 4.0: How Will Technology Transform the Industrial World by 2025,” Boston Consulting Group, September 2015.

Lund, Susan et al. “The Future of Work after COVID-19,” McKinsey Global Institute, February 2021.

_____. “The Future of Work in America: People and Places, Today and Tomorrow,” McKinsey Global Institute, July 2019.

“A Manufacturing Marshall Plan,” Association for Manufacturing Excellence, 2020.

Meeder, Hans and Brett Pawlowski, “Preparing Our Students for the Real World,” National Center for College and Career Transitions, 2020.

National Federation of Independent Business, “NFIB Small Business Jobs Report,” Monthly issues 2019-2021.

“Resetting the Future of Work Agenda: Disruption and Renewal in a Post-COVID World,” World Economic Forum and Mercer, 2020.

“Reshoring Surges to Record High: 2020 Data Report,” Reshoring Initiative, May 2021.

Ross, Martha. “Meet the Out-of-Work,” Brookings Institution, June 2017.

Rothwell, Jonathan, “Assessing the Economic Gains of Eradicating Illiteracy Nationally and Regionally in the United States,” Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy, and Gallup, Inc., September 2020.

Schwab, Klaus, ed. “Global Competitiveness Report 2018,” World Economic Forum, 2018.

Schwab, Klaus. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond,” World Economic Forum, January 2016.

Smit, Sven, et al. “The Future of Work in Europe,” McKinsey Global Institute, June 10, 2020.

“Social Press Index: United States,” Social Progress Imperative, September 2020.

Strack, Ranier et al. “The Future of Jobs in the Era of AI,” Boston Consulting Group, March 18, 2022.

_____. “The Global Workforce Crisis: $10 Trillion at Risk,” Boston Consulting Group, July 2, 2014.

Sneader, Kevin and Shubham Singhal, “From Thinking about the Next Normal to Making It Work: What to Stop, Start, and Accelerate,” McKinsey and Company, May 2020.

“The State of Skills 2021: Endangered,” Degreed Inc, February 2021,

“Training to Win: Talent Solutions for the New Economy,” The Manufacturing Institute, July 2017.

Tucker, Marc. “9 Building Blocks for a World-Class Education System,” National Center on Education and the Economy, 2016.

“2018 Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute Skills Gap and Future of Work Study,” Deloitte Development LLC, 2018.

“2019 SAT Suite of Assessments Program Results,” College Board, September 2019.

“2020 Global Talent Trends,” LinkedIn Talent Solutions, January 2020.

Vegas, Emiliana and Rebecca Winthrop. “Beyond Reopening Schools: How Education Can Emerge Stronger than before COVID-19,” Brookings Institution, September 8, 2020.

_____. “Global Education: How to Transform School Systems?” Brookings Institution, November 17, 2020.

Zaber, Melanie A. et al. “Reimaging the Workforce Development and Employment System for the 21st Century and Beyond,” RAND Corporation, September 2019.

Books

Crehan, Lucy. Cleverlands: The Secrets behind the Success of the World’s Education Superpowers. London: Unbound, 2016.

Gordon, Edward E. Future Jobs: Solving the Employment and Skills Crisis. Santa Barbara. CA: Praeger, 2018.

_____. Skill Wars: Winning the Battle for Productivity and Profit. Boston: Butterworth-Heineman, 2000.

_____. The 2020 Meltdown. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2005.

_____. Winning the Global Talent Showdown: How Businesses and Communities Can Partner to Rebuild the Jos Pipeline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Adaptability of the US Engineering and Technical Workforce: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies, Press, 2018.

Rozelle, Scott and Natalie Hell.  Invisible China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.

Senge, Peter. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday, 1990.

Weise, Michelle R. Long Life Learning: Preparing for Jobs that Don’t Even Exist Yet. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2021.

Articles

Amos, Jason. “U.S. High School Graduation Rates Hits Record High – Are the Gains Real or Manufactured?” Alliance for Excellent Education Blog Post, December 5, 2017.

Brancaccio, David and Rose Conlon. “How People without College Degrees Can Find Higher Paying Jobs,” Marketplace Morning Report, February 4, 2021.

“Congress’s Doctor Shortage,” Editorial, Wall Street Journal, January 4, 2021.

Fichuk, Karen. “Workforce Investment Is Essential for Maintaining Industry Momentum,” Cain’s Chicago Business, March 18, 2021.

Friedman, Lucy N.  “Bridging the Gap between School and Work,” The Pinkerton Papers, March 2021.

Gaul, Patty. “Human Capital Is Optimized Only with Ongoing Efforts,” TD magazine, December 2017.

Gordon, Edward E. “Assist Reshoring through Regional Talent Innovation Networks,” IEEE-USA InSight, February 5, 2015.

_____.  “The Global Talent Chase: China, India and U.S. Vie for Skilled Workers,” The Futurist, November/December 2012.

Hancock, Bryan et al. “Getting Practical about the Future of Work,” McKinsey Quarterly, January 30, 2020.

Koh, Elizabeth. “COVID-19 Vaccines Are in High Demand, but Thousands More Workers Are Needed to Make Them,” Wall Street Journal, January 4, 2021.

Lohr, Steve. “The Pandemic Has Accelerated Demands for More Skilled Workers, New York Times, July 13, 2020.

Long, Heather. “Millions of Jobs Probably Aren’t Coming Back, Even after the Pandemic Ends,” Washington Post, February 17, 2021.

Lowrey, Annie and Catherine Rampbell, “Little Federal Help for the Long-Term Unemployed,” New Work Times, November 2, 2012.

Starner, Tom. “What the 2030 Workforce Could Look Like without Reskilling,” Human Resource Executive, May 5, 2021.

Terlep Sharon et al. “Low on Workers, Manufacturers Recruit Their Executives for the Factory Floor,” Wall Street Journal, January 9, 2021.

Whittaker, J. Gregg and Gerald Williams. “Skills Gap – A Strategy for Increasing Knowledge Worker Supply and Demand,” Journal of Business, September 2016.

Wolf, Martin. “Why Once Successful Countries Like the UK Get Left Behind,” Financial Times, February 21, 2021.

“2019 Training Industry Report,” Training, November/December 2019.

“2020 Training Industry Report,” Training, November/December 2020.

Public Documents

Dubina, Kevin S.et al. “Projections Overview and Highlights, 2019-29,” Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2020.

Ice, Lindsey et al. “Employment Projections in a Pandemic Environment,” Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2021.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. “Adult Literacy in the United States,” Data Point, NCES 2019-179, July 2019.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. “Literacy and Numeracy Skills of U.S. Men and Women,” Data Point. NCES 2018-164, August 2018.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).  Mathematics Assessments, 2005-2021.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).  Reading Assessments, 1992-2021.

 

No comments: